Explain the feed in one glance.
We scan Bluesky to find what's trending and explain it in simple terms. No noise, just context.
A proposed "peace deal" for Ukraine, reportedly originating from Russia and involving territorial concessions, is fueling intense debate. Users are scrutinizing the terms, with many expressing concern that it rewards Russian aggression and undermines the alliance's core principle of mutual defense. There's also discussion around potential Israeli strikes on a member nation and speculation about US pressure on Ukraine regarding arms supplies and security guarantees. This trending topic reflects deep anxieties about regional stability, the future of alliances, and the potential implications of capitulation to an aggressor.
Until now I thought this so-called “peace proposal” was just another Russian info-op. Turns out it’s real and it’s pure capitulation. 🚫 Written by non-diplomats, it hands Putin a veto over #NATO and demands Ukraine give up territory he couldn’t conquer in four years of war. Why reward aggression?
Bibi launching a strike against a NATO ally is such a stupid cyberpunk nightmare
Of course, if Israel bombs Turkey, a NATO member state, I believe it is the obligation of every NATO member state to follow Article 5 to the letter, because obligations are to states, not governments :)